Examining Grok 3’s “DeepSearch” and “Think” Features
Image Credit: Niklas Hamann | Splash
Grok 3, released on February 17, 2025 by xAI, has introduced two features—“DeepSearch” and “Think”—that aim to distinguish it from competitors. As AI systems increasingly shape information access and problem-solving, these tools have drawn attention from users and analysts alike.
[Read More: Elon Musk's xAI Breakthrough: Supercomputer Built in 19 Days Sets New AI Benchmark]
What Are DeepSearch and Think?
Grok 3, the third iteration of xAI’s language model, arrives amid heightened competition in the AI sector. DeepSearch enables the system to pull data from the web and X posts in real time, compiling it into summarized responses. It targets queries needing current information—like recent tech breakthroughs or public reactions to events—drawing on external sources rather than a static knowledge base. xAI has positioned this as a rapid-response tool, though specifics on its data-filtering methods remain undisclosed.
Think, by contrast, operates internally, relying on Grok 3’s pre-existing knowledge to reason through problems. It’s designed for tasks such as solving equations or analyzing abstract concepts, presenting a breakdown of its logic—though not all steps are shown, a decision xAI attributes to proprietary concerns. Unlike DeepSearch, it doesn’t fetch new data, focusing instead on processing what the model already holds.
[Read More: Elon Musk’s Grok 3: The Strongest AI Ever Built?]
How They Differ: Scope and Mechanics
The two features differ markedly in their scope. DeepSearch operates as a real-time research tool within Grok 3, accessing online content and X posts to respond to queries about current events. For instance, a question about today’s cryptocurrency fluctuations would trigger it to gather and summarize recent updates from relevant sources. Users receive responses accompanied by citations, though some X posts as of late February 2025 point to potential issues, noting occasional references to outdated or off-topic links—observations that, while unconfirmed by systematic data, suggest early questions about its precision.
Think, by contrast, relies solely on Grok 3’s internal knowledge base. It addresses self-contained problems—such as optimizing a software function—through a step-by-step reasoning process. Designed to prioritize correctness rather than rapid responses, it takes anywhere from seconds to over a minute to complete tasks, depending on their complexity. Its approach of revealing only major reasoning steps, rather than every detail, has prompted discussion on X, with some users questioning if this partial disclosure reduces its usefulness for learning purposes.
User Options: Selection and Application
Grok 3 integrates both features into its interface, available through the Grok app and X platform. Users see “DeepSearch” and “Think” as clickable options beside the query bar. X Premium+ subscribers, who got first access on February 18, report no additional cost for either, though a free trial for all X users began this week, likely ending around March 1. No official usage limits have been confirmed, though some restrictions apply.
Choosing between them depends on the query. DeepSearch suits time-sensitive or context-heavy tasks—journalists, for instance, might use it to track breaking AI policy debates, while researchers could probe X sentiment on a new gadget. Think fits scenarios requiring no external input, such as a student solving a calculus problem or a coder refining an algorithm. Some X users report testing both for ambiguous queries, like “What’s driving AI hype now?”—DeepSearch offers current takes, Think provides a theoretical angle.
If neither button is pressed, Grok 3 defaults to a basic conversational mode, relying on its pre-trained knowledge without searching the web or reasoning step-by-step, and cannot independently decide to fetch real-time data. Practical distinctions emerge in execution. DeepSearch delivers faster responses, often under 10 seconds, but its accuracy hinges on source quality, a weak point flagged in early feedback. Think’s slower pace—sometimes exceeding a minute—reflects its focus on verification, though its internal-only approach leaves it blind to recent shifts.
Questions have arisen, however, about Grok 3’s behaviour when no mode is selected. Some users note that even without pressing "DeepSearch", responses can include details that feel like real-time search results—such as mentions of recent X trends or specific dates tied to xAI’s rollout. This stems from Grok 3’s continuously updated knowledge base, which incorporates information up to the present, allowing its default mode to mimic aspects of DeepSearch without actively querying live sources. xAI has not clarified whether this blending of capabilities is intentional, but it suggests the AI’s baseline performance may blur the lines between its specialized features, potentially confusing users expecting a stricter separation.
AI Context: Capabilities and Questions
From an AI perspective, DeepSearch and Think highlight divergent development paths. DeepSearch aligns with systems pulling live data, akin to efforts by DeepSeek or Anthropic, though its X integration sets it apart. Its reliance on unfiltered web and social media inputs raises concerns about misinformation, a challenge xAI has yet to publicly address. Think mirrors advances in reasoning-focused models like OpenAI’s o1, emphasizing logical coherence over breadth—a trade-off that limits its scope but deepens its analytical reach.
Analysts see both as steps toward autonomous AI agents, capable of independent task execution. DeepSearch’s data-gathering mimics a research assistant, while Think’s step-by-step logic suggests self-guided problem-solving. Yet gaps persist: DeepSearch’s opaque filtering and Think’s hidden reasoning steps fuel skepticism about transparency, a recurring critique of xAI’s approach. Notably, users cannot select both features simultaneously, as their distinct purposes—real-time retrieval versus internal analysis—remain separate, with no hybrid mode offered to blend live data into Think’s reasoning process.
Performance claims are under scrutiny. xAI touts Grok 3’s edge in science and math benchmarks, but independent verification is pending. X posts from users show mixed results—DeepSearch excels in speed, less so in precision; Think earns praise for clarity but falters on time-sensitive queries. Competitors, meanwhile, offer broader transparency, a point of contention among AI ethicists.
[Read More: X Expands Grok AI Chatbot Access with Freemium Model to Boost User Engagement]
When to Use Which Feature
Deciding when to use DeepSearch or Think hinges on the task at hand, as their strengths cater to different needs. DeepSearch is suited for situations demanding the latest information, such as monitoring breaking news or gauging real-time public reactions on X—ideal for professionals like reporters needing quick updates or analysts tracking market shifts, despite its occasional sourcing hiccups.
Think, conversely, is better for problems that stand alone, like working through a mathematical proof or debugging code, where its slower, verification-focused process offers clarity for students or developers unconcerned with external updates.
For queries blending both needs—like analyzing current events with deep reasoning—users must choose one or toggle between them, as Grok 3 offers no combined mode, leaving it to individual judgment to weigh speed against depth.
Disabling both features, reverting to Grok 3’s default mode, suits general understanding of common topics; for example, asking “What is artificial intelligence?” yields a concise overview from its updated knowledge base, without the complexity of real-time data or detailed reasoning, fitting casual inquiries where speed and simplicity outweigh specialized depth.
[Read More: Elon Musk’s Grok-2 Unrestricted Political Imagery - A Double-Edged Sword?]
Source: Tech Crunch, x.ai
